Web survey bibliography - Conference proceedings (83)

Page:

• 1
• 2

• The Influence of Human Cues on Drop-out and Answer Behaviour within Web Surveys; 2008; Oesterlau, T., Geißler, H.
• Sampling for web surveys; 2007; Rivers, D.
• Reconstructing childhood health histories using internet panels; 2007; Smith, J. P.
• Pilot study to recruite a sample for an online panel: Effects of contact mode, incentives and information...; 2007; Scherpenzeel, A.
• Modes, trends, and content: A comparison of the 2003 HRS internet survey with HRS 2002 and 2004 Core...; 2007; Weir, D.
• Lessons learned: Converting a telephone survey panel to an internet panel; 2007; Roe, D. J., Stockdale, J., Farrelly, M., Heinrich, T.
• Developments in electronic survey design for establishment surveys; 2007; O'Neill, G.
• Response time measurement in the lab and on the Web: A comparison; 2007; Galesic, M., Reips, U.-D., Kaczmirek, L., Czienskowski, U., Liske, N., von Oertzen, T.
• Questionnaire and Survey Design for Online Research; 2007; Wydra, D., Fisher, L., Strunk, K.
• Using Technology to Improve Data Quality; 2007; Cunningham, J., Pearson, C., Parkhurst, D.
• Mobile Phone Data Collection; 2007; Lavine, S.
• Effects of Offering Web Questionnaires as an Option in Enterprise Surveys: the Swedish Experience; 2007; Erikson, J., Furubjelke, E.
• Using the Web for Surveys of Medical Providers; 2007; Narayanan, V., Giambo, P., Fry, S., Crafts, J.
• Boosting Response Rates: Are There Optimal Times to Email Respondents?; 2007; Bennett-Harper, S., O'Brien, J., Levin, K., Davis, B., Shipp, S., Campbell, S., Sienkiewicz, R.
• Beyond Demographics: Are ‘Webographic’ Questions Useful for Reducing the Selection Bias...; 2007; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A.
• Maximising respondent engagement: The use of rich media; 2007; Reid, J., Morden, M., Perez Echeverria, A.
• Truth in measurement: Comparing Web Based interviewing Techniques; 2007; Couper, M. P., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J., Thomas, R. K.
• The power of the visible: Visual design for Web surveys; 2006; Couper, M. P.
• Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
• Weighting an Internet Panel Survey on Drug Use and Abuse; 2006; Gordek, H., Williams, Ri. L., Dai, L.
• The professional respondent problem in online panel surveys today; 2005; Fulgoni, G.
• Satisficing behavior in online panelists; 2005; Downes-Le Guin, T.
• Panel proliferation and quality concerns; 2005; Faasse, J.
• Electronic Voting Machines – A comparison applying the principles of computer-human interaction...; 2003; Callegaro, M., Peytcheva, E.
• More than a thousand words? Visual cues and visual knowledge; 2002; Prior, M.
• Questionnaire Pretesting Methods: Do Different Techniques and Different Organizations Produce Similar...; 2001; Rothgeb, J. M., Willis, G. B., Forsyth, B. H.
• Practical methods for sampling rare and mobile populations; 2001; Kalton, G.
• Building an alternative response process model for business surveys; 2001; Willimack, D. K., Nichols, E. M.
• Human centered measures of success in web site design; 1998; Kirakowski, J., Claridge, N., Whitehand, R.
• The Prodigy Experiment in Using e-Mail for Tracking Public Opinion; 1995; Werner, J., Maisel, R., Robinson, K.
• Respondent preferences toward audio-CASI and how that affects data quality; 1995; Kinsey, S. H., Thornberry, J. S., Carson, C. P., Duffer, A. P.
• Best pracices in disk-by-mail surveys; 1992; Witt, K. J., Bernstein, S.
• Customer satisfaction research using disks-by-mail; 1989; Zabdan, P., Frost, L.

Page:

• 1
• 2